Wednesday, March 26, 2008
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
i concur
By John Piper January 1, 1995
Investigating dog life in Minnesota has solidified my decision to vote against those who endorse the right to abortion. So then what is my response to the charge of being a one-issue voter?
No endorsement of any single issue qualifies a person to hold public office. Being pro-life does not make a person a good governor, mayor, or president. But there are numerous single issues that disqualify a person from public office. For example, any candidate who endorsed bribery as a form of government efficiency would be disqualified, no matter what his party or platform was. Or a person who endorsed corporate fraud (say under $50 million) would be disqualified no matter what else he endorsed. Or a person who said that no black people could hold office—on that single issue alone he would be unfit for office. Or a person who said that rape is only a misdemeanor—that single issue would end his political career. These examples could go on and on. Everybody knows a single issue that for them would disqualify a candidate for office.
It's the same with marriage. No one quality makes a good wife or husband, but some qualities would make a person unacceptable. For example, back when I was thinking about getting married, not liking cats would not have disqualified a woman as my wife, but not liking people would. Drinking coffee would not, but drinking whiskey would. Kissing dogs wouldn't, but kissing the mailman would. And so on. Being a single-issue fiancé does not mean that only one issue matters. It means that some issues may matter enough to break off the relationship.
So it is with politics. You have to decide what those issues are for you. What do you think disqualifies a person from holding public office? I believe that the endorsement of the right to kill unborn children disqualifies a person from any position of public office. It's simply the same as saying that the endorsement of racism, fraud, or bribery would disqualify him—except that child-killing is more serious than those.
When we bought our dog at the Humane Society, I picked up a brochure on the laws of Minnesota concerning animals. Statute 343.2, subdivision 1 says, "No person shall . . . unjustifiably injure, maim, mutilate or kill any animal." Subdivision 7 says, "No person shall willfully instigate or in any way further any act of cruelty to any animal." The penalty: "A person who fails to comply with any provision of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor."
Now this set me to pondering the rights of the unborn. An eight-week-old human fetus has a beating heart, an EKG, brain waves, thumb-sucking, pain sensitivity, finger-grasping, and genetic humanity, but under our present laws is not a human person with rights under the 14th Amendment, which says that "no state shall deprive any person of life . . . without due process of law." Well, I wondered, if the unborn do not qualify as persons, it seems that they could at least qualify as animals, say a dog, or at least a cat. Could we not at least charge abortion clinics with cruelty to animals under Statute 343.2, subdivision 7? Why is it legal to "maim, mutilate and kill" a pain-sensitive unborn human being but not an animal?
These reflections have confirmed my conviction never to vote for a person who endorses such an evil—even if he could balance the budget tomorrow and end all taxation.
* * * This article is from A Godward Life, Book I: Savoring the Supremacy of God in All of Life by John Piper (Sisters, OR: Multnomah Publishers, 1997), pp. 279-280. Used with permission.
© Desiring God
Permissions: You are permitted and encouraged to reproduce and distribute this material in any format provided that you do not alter the wording in any way and do not charge a fee beyond the cost of reproduction. For web posting, a link to this document on our website is preferred. Any exceptions to the above must be approved by Desiring God.
Please include the following statement on any distributed copy: By John Piper. © Desiring God. Website: desiringGod.org
http://www.desiringgod.org/ResourceLibrary/Articles/ByDate/1995/1524_OneIssue_Politics_OneIssue_Marriage_and_the_Humane_Society/
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
tag!!
1. you must make a post called "tag!" (or some derivative thereof) and you must write a fact about yourself for every letter of your middle name.
Tuesday, December 25, 2007
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Friday, December 07, 2007
point taken!
I guess that what I meant to say that I've noticed as I've grown older (I'm so old; I know) that to my appetite, donuts just aren't what they used to be. and I thank God for that, because I would be a lot heavier if they were. because let me tell you, i used to LOVE donuts!!! Now I just usually feel gross after I eat them (the problem being that I still eat them!); hence the frustration in my previous post.
regarding michael's comment, i have to say that krispy kreme never has won me over. (that was an appropriate use of the word 'never'). seeing them float down the river of grease just grossed me out.

this donut would like to say..."happy winter! it's beginning to look a lot like CHRISTMAS! with white frosting and SPRINKLES!" :)
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
something i've realized...
UNLESS they're from dunkin donuts in guayaquil maybe...
Wednesday, November 07, 2007
Tuesday, November 06, 2007
is it just me...
Thursday, October 25, 2007
peru!
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
exciting again!
it was pretty stinkin special, and to top it all off, i had the HONOR of getting baptized with three of my youth group girls!!!
(next to me, left to right: kacey, anne, brittany...below is...alyssa?)
the world might call it random, but i believe that God had it all planned out.
here are my thoughts from three days later that i sent to a couple of my girls:
"i just have to say that i am really thinking that God set us up. i've been preaching to people over the past several months about how baptism is a gift that He's given to His people--an outward picture of an internal & spiritual reality. we may have done things out of the box as far as church culture goes, but i can't help but have this overflowing JOY in my heart that can only be from Jesus himself!!!! i really think His power was made perfect in our weakness, and He showed up (i mean supernaturally) and really sent his spirit upon that act of faith on friday. i feel like i've experienced the gift like He really created the gift to be experienced. it's not going away. i feel like i've been anointed with the oil of gladness! (meaning HIS gladness--heb 1:9 & psalm 45:7)
is it just me?"
Monday, October 22, 2007
exciting!
i can't seem to be able to leave a comment on their blog because my computer is stupid, but i just wanted to say congratulations!!!
:)
so anyway... if you don't know... the baby is here!!
Thursday, September 06, 2007
fine. ;)
2. went to noah's ark for kelli's bachelorette party. i went down both the plunge and the point of no return for the very first time ever!! logic: "missy, if you can jump off a bridge, you can go down this waterslide."
8. took a little road trip the next day back to kansas city (this time with doug and nate) to pick anne up from the sti... QUICKEST ROAD TRIP EVER! (it was even quicker than our trip to florida, jenny!!!) oh, and we totally went to kansas, too.
14. went to the swaagman house for their barbecue and played ladder ball for the first time!!! and michael and i came back for the win!!! libby is HUGE. and, in a classic combination of fromader+swaagman style, had a wondefully catered and chillaxed time!
15. took a week's vacation and went down to the wycliffe bible translators' midwestern base in west chicago for TOTAL IT UP! a taste of translation and linguistics!!!! it was a pretty sweet vacation, where i got to take classes in things like grammar, translation, and FUN-etics!!!! but really, i loved it. it was one of the best vacations ever. met some awesome people and played some awesome bible trivia!!!
17. officially got OLD and ate a ridiculous amount of mexican food.




















